By Dr. Marcus Judge

Next Lesson - Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacogenetics

Pharmacology


Contents

Abstract

  • Pharmacodynamics is the study of what the drug does to the body: the molecular interaction between a drug and its target, and the dose-response relationship that follows.
  • Drugs act predominantly on four classes of target: receptors, enzymes, ion channels and transporters. Drug-target binding is described by affinity (how tightly the drug binds) and efficacy (the response that binding produces).
  • Drugs that activate a receptor are agonists (full or partial). Inverse agonists reduce a receptor's baseline activity. Drugs that block a response are antagonists (competitive or non-competitive). The dose-response curve summarises these properties through EC50 (potency) and Emax (maximum effect).
  • The space between effective and toxic concentrations is the therapeutic window. Adverse drug reactions are classified A-E (Augmented, Bizarre, Chronic, Delayed, End-of-treatment). This extends the original Rawlins-Thompson classification, which had only types A and B.

Core

Introduction to Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacodynamics, often shortened to PD, is the study of how a drug exerts its effect on the body once it has reached its site of action. Where pharmacokinetics describes what the body does to the drug, pharmacodynamics describes what the drug does to the body.

The two are inseparable in clinical practice. A drug with the wrong pharmacokinetics never reaches a useful concentration. A drug with the wrong pharmacodynamics produces no useful response even when it does reach its target. Together they define every drug in the formulary.

Almost all of pharmacodynamics can be reduced to two questions:

  • What does the drug bind to? (its target)
  • What happens when it binds? (the response)
Pharmacokinetics "What the body does to the drug" Absorption Distribution Metabolism Excretion [plasma] Pharmacodynamics "What the drug does to the body" Drug binds target receptor · enzyme · channel · transporter Cellular response Therapeutic effect SimpleMed Original by Dr Marcus Judge

Diagram: Pharmacokinetics governs drug concentration at the site of action; pharmacodynamics governs the response that concentration produces.

Drug Targets

The vast majority of clinically useful drugs act on one of four kinds of macromolecule (a large molecule, usually a protein). The principles of how each of these is built and regulated are covered in Structure of Proteins and Enzymes and Regulation of Protein Function.

Receptors

A receptor is a protein whose normal job is to recognise an endogenous (made by the body) chemical messenger, such as a hormone or a neurotransmitter, and translate that recognition into a cellular response. Drugs that target receptors do so by mimicking, blocking or modulating the action of the natural ligand (the molecule that normally binds to the receptor).

There are four broad receptor superfamilies, each with a characteristic timescale of response:

  • Ligand-gated ion channels: respond in milliseconds. Examples: the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction (where a motor nerve meets a muscle fibre), the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor in the central nervous system.
  • G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs): receptors that signal inside the cell through a G-protein (a molecular switch), so they respond in seconds. Examples: adrenergic (adrenaline-responsive) receptors, muscarinic (acetylcholine-responsive) receptors and opioid receptors (which respond to morphine-like drugs). These are by far the largest receptor family and are covered in detail in G-Protein Coupled Receptors.
  • Kinase-linked receptors: linked to a kinase (an enzyme that adds phosphate groups to other proteins), they respond in minutes to hours. Examples: the insulin receptor, growth factor receptors.
  • Nuclear (intracellular) receptors: respond in hours to days because they act by altering gene transcription. Examples: glucocorticoid receptor (the target of steroid hormones such as cortisol), oestrogen receptor, thyroid hormone receptor.

Enzymes

Many drugs are enzyme inhibitors that block the conversion of a substrate into its product. Important examples include:

  • ACE inhibitors (e.g. ramipril) block angiotensin-converting enzyme.
  • Statins block HMG-CoA reductase (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase), the rate-limiting enzyme (the step that sets the pace) of cholesterol synthesis.
  • Proton pump inhibitors (e.g. omeprazole) inactivate the gastric H+/K+ ATPase (the proton pump, an enzyme that uses ATP to swap hydrogen ions for potassium ions).
  • NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) inhibit cyclo-oxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2), reducing the synthesis of prostaglandins (local chemical signals in inflammation and pain).
  • Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (e.g. sildenafil) prevent the breakdown of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), a signalling molecule that relaxes smooth muscle.

A small number of drugs are false substrates, fed into a metabolic pathway to produce an inactive or harmful end-product; many cancer chemotherapeutics work this way.

Ion Channels

Drugs that act directly on ion channels modulate the flow of ions across the cell membrane. The principles of how channels generate the electrical activity of excitable cells are covered in Membrane Potentials and Action Potentials. Important examples:

  • Calcium channel blockers (e.g. amlodipine, verapamil) block voltage-gated L-type calcium channels (channels of a long-lasting subtype that open when the membrane voltage changes).
  • Local anaesthetics (e.g. lidocaine) block voltage-gated sodium channels.
  • Class III antiarrhythmics (drugs that correct abnormal heart rhythm, e.g. amiodarone) block voltage-gated potassium channels.
  • Sulfonylureas (e.g. gliclazide) close ATP-sensitive potassium channels in pancreatic β-cells (the insulin-producing cells), triggering insulin release.

Transporters

Transporters move ions and small molecules across membranes: sometimes against a concentration gradient (active transport) and sometimes down it (facilitated diffusion, which is passive movement through a carrier protein). Important examples of drugs that block transporters:

  • Loop diuretics (e.g. furosemide) block the Na+/K+/2Cl− cotransporter in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle (a segment of the nephron).
  • Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics (e.g. bendroflumethiazide and indapamide) block the Na+/Cl− cotransporter in the distal convoluted tubule (the coiled part of the nephron after the loop of Henle). NICE advises a thiazide-like diuretic (one with a different chemical structure but the same target), such as indapamide, in preference to a conventional thiazide such as bendroflumethiazide when starting or changing diuretic treatment for hypertension.
  • SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, e.g. sertraline) block the serotonin transporter in central neurons.
  • SGLT2 inhibitors (e.g. empagliflozin) block sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 in the proximal tubule.

Drug-Receptor Binding

The interaction between a drug and its target has two independent properties: affinity (how tightly the drug binds) and efficacy (what happens once it has bound). A useful drug needs both.

Affinity

Affinity is a measure of how tightly a drug binds its target. It is described quantitatively by the dissociation constant, Kd: the concentration of drug at which half the available receptors are occupied at equilibrium. A drug with a low Kd binds tightly and is said to have a high affinity. A drug with a high Kd binds loosely and has low affinity.

Low Kd  =  high affinity   (less drug needed to occupy receptors)

Affinity alone says nothing about whether a drug produces a response; an antagonist can have very high affinity and still cause no effect by itself.

Efficacy and Intrinsic Activity

Efficacy is the capacity of a drug to produce a response once bound to the receptor. It is sometimes called intrinsic activity. A full agonist has maximum efficacy, a partial agonist intermediate efficacy, and an antagonist zero efficacy.

The cleanest way to remember the distinction:

  • Affinity: will the drug bind?
  • Efficacy: once bound, will it switch the receptor on?

Selectivity and Specificity

Few drugs bind only one target. Selectivity describes the degree to which a drug prefers one target over others; a more selective drug tends to cause fewer off-target side effects (effects at targets other than the intended one). Specificity is sometimes used interchangeably with selectivity but is best reserved for the strict sense: a drug that interacts with only one receptor subtype is specific.

Selective β1-blockers such as atenolol and bisoprolol illustrate the point. They have a higher affinity for cardiac β1 receptors than for bronchial β2 receptors, and so cause less bronchoconstriction (narrowing of the airways) than older non-selective agents like propranolol. Selectivity is dose-dependent; at high doses, even "cardioselective" beta-blockers begin to block β2 receptors significantly.

Agonists and Antagonists

Drugs are classified by what happens when they bind. The basic division is between agonists (drugs that activate the receptor) and antagonists (drugs that block the receptor without activating it).

log [drug] Response (%) 100 50 20 0 constitutive activity Full agonist Partial agonist Antagonist Inverse agonist SimpleMed Original by Dr Marcus Judge

Diagram: Dose-response curves for a full agonist, partial agonist, antagonist and inverse agonist. The horizontal dashed line marks constitutive (background) receptor activity in the absence of drug.

Full Agonists

A full agonist can produce the maximum response available in the receptor system being studied. Full agonism depends on the receptor system and the response measured. A ligand made by the body is not automatically a full agonist. In systems with spare receptors, the maximum response can be reached without occupying every receptor.

Partial Agonists

A partial agonist binds the receptor but produces a sub-maximal response no matter how high the dose. Partial agonists have intermediate efficacy. They behave as agonists when no full agonist is present, but as antagonists in the presence of a full agonist (because they occupy receptors that would otherwise be fully activated).

The classic example is buprenorphine. It is a partial agonist at the μ-opioid receptor and is used in opioid substitution therapy. It binds with high affinity but produces a sub-maximal response, which gives it two useful properties. It provides enough opioid effect to suppress withdrawal. The ceiling on its effect also limits respiratory depression (slow, shallow breathing), so overdose is less likely to stop breathing than with full agonists like heroin. The ceiling is not a guarantee of safety: buprenorphine can still cause severe respiratory depression, especially when it is taken with benzodiazepines (sedatives such as diazepam) or other sedatives, or misused by injection.

Inverse Agonists

Some receptors have constitutive activity: they generate a baseline response even when no ligand is bound. An inverse agonist binds the receptor and reduces this baseline activity below its resting level. This is the opposite effect to an agonist, but it is not the same as an antagonist. Antihistamines such as cetirizine are now believed to act as inverse agonists at the H1 histamine receptor rather than as simple antagonists.

Competitive Antagonists

A competitive antagonist binds the same site on the receptor as the agonist (the orthosteric site) but produces no response. By occupying the binding site, it prevents the agonist from binding. Crucially, the agonist can outcompete the antagonist if its concentration is high enough, so a competitive antagonist shifts the agonist dose-response curve to the right but does not reduce Emax. Potency is reduced; maximal efficacy is preserved.

Examples include:

  • Naloxone at the μ-opioid receptor (used to reverse opioid overdose).
  • Atenolol at the β1-adrenergic receptor.
  • Losartan at the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor.

Non-Competitive Antagonists

A non-competitive antagonist blocks the receptor in one of two ways. It binds the same site as the agonist irreversibly, or it binds a different site (an allosteric site) and changes the receptor's shape so that the agonist can no longer activate it. Increasing the agonist concentration cannot overcome a non-competitive block, so the dose-response curve flattens: Emax is reduced, and increasing the dose of agonist will not restore the maximum response.

Phenoxybenzamine, an irreversible α-adrenergic antagonist used in the pre-operative management of phaeochromocytoma (an adrenal tumour that releases adrenaline), is the classic receptor example. (Aspirin is sometimes called an "irreversible non-competitive inhibitor" too, but it acts on an enzyme (cyclo-oxygenase) rather than a receptor, and is best understood under enzyme inhibition.)

Competitive antagonism log [agonist] Response Emax agonist alone + competitive antagonist curve shifts right same Emax; lower potency Non-competitive antagonism log [agonist] Response Emax ½ Emax agonist alone + non-competitive antagonist curve flattens lower Emax (illustrative curve) SimpleMed Original by Dr Marcus Judge

Diagram: Effect of competitive (rightward shift, same Emax) and non-competitive (lower Emax) antagonism on an agonist dose-response curve.

Dose-Response Relationships

The relationship between drug dose and biological response is rarely linear. Plotted on a logarithmic dose axis it forms the familiar sigmoid (S-shaped) dose-response curve, from which two key parameters are read off: EC50 and Emax.

EC50 and Potency

EC50 is the concentration of drug that produces 50% of the maximum response on a graded concentration-response curve. It is a measure of potency: the lower the EC50, the more potent the drug. Potency tells you how much drug is needed, but says nothing about how good the response will be.

The closely related ED50 is the dose that produces a defined response in 50% of a population (a quantal, or all-or-none, response, e.g. the dose at which half of patients have their migraine relieved). EC50 describes the curve in an individual. ED50 and TD50 (the dose that is toxic in 50% of a population) describe the spread across a population. They are the values used in the therapeutic index calculation below.

Potency matters in practice mainly because it determines the dose: a more potent drug is given in smaller doses, but a more potent drug is not necessarily a better drug.

Emax and Efficacy

Emax is the maximum response a drug can produce, no matter how much is given. It is a measure of efficacy. A drug with high efficacy can produce a large effect; a drug with low efficacy cannot, regardless of dose.

A useful pair of memory hooks:

  • Potency: how much drug is needed.
  • Efficacy: how big the effect can be.

Fentanyl is roughly 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine (lower EC50), and the two have similar maximum efficacy at the μ-opioid receptor; both are full agonists. Paracetamol, by contrast, has a much lower efficacy than morphine for severe pain. It is used for mild to moderate pain, and giving more paracetamol does not make it match a therapeutic dose of morphine. The dose cannot be pushed higher in any case: the adult maximum is 4 g per day, and overdose can cause liver damage. Potency simply tells you the dose; efficacy tells you the ceiling.

Therapeutic Index and Therapeutic Window

The therapeutic index (TI) is the ratio of the dose that produces toxicity to the dose that produces the desired effect:

Therapeutic Index  =  Toxic Dose (TD50)  ÷  Effective Dose (ED50)

A drug with a high therapeutic index has a wide margin of safety. A drug with a narrow therapeutic index has overlapping effective and toxic ranges and requires careful dosing: warfarin, digoxin, lithium, phenytoin, theophylline, gentamicin, and ciclosporin are the classic examples. These drugs are discussed in more detail in the article on Pharmacokinetics.

The therapeutic window is the related concept expressed in terms of plasma concentration: the range over which the drug is both effective and not yet toxic.

Variability in Drug Response

Two patients given the same dose of the same drug can have markedly different responses. Identifying the reasons is one of the central skills of clinical prescribing. The major sources of variability are:

  • Body weight and composition: lipophilic (fat-soluble) drugs distribute into adipose tissue (fat), so the volume of distribution (the apparent volume a drug spreads through) scales with body fat.
  • Age: neonates have immature hepatic enzymes and renal function; the elderly have reduced renal clearance (slower removal of the drug by the kidneys) and lower lean body mass.
  • Sex: differences in body composition and in the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, the main family of drug-metabolising enzymes in the liver, produce small but measurable effects on plasma concentrations.
  • Genetics: CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms (common gene variants) produce poor, intermediate, normal and ultra-rapid metaboliser phenotypes (groups defined by how fast a person metabolises a drug). The older term for normal is "extensive". Acetylator status (fast vs slow acetylation, one way the liver breaks down some drugs) affects isoniazid and hydralazine. Pharmacogenetics (how genes affect drug response) is covered in detail in the SimpleMed article on Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacogenetics.
  • Co-existing disease: renal, hepatic and cardiac failure all change drug handling, as does any acute illness with a significant haemodynamic effect (a change in blood flow or blood pressure). Chronic Kidney Disease and Hepatic Pathology both have direct dosing implications.
  • Drug interactions (see below).
  • The placebo effect: expectation, the act of taking a tablet, and the patient-clinician relationship all influence symptomatic outcomes.

Drug-Drug Interactions

Drug interactions are conventionally split into two types. Pharmacokinetic interactions are those in which one drug changes the concentration of the other, through absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion. Pharmacodynamic interactions are those in which the two drugs combine at the level of the response itself.

Pharmacodynamic interactions fall into three patterns:

  • Additive: the combined effect equals the sum of the individual effects. Alcohol and benzodiazepines (sedatives such as diazepam) are both CNS depressants, so together they can produce additive sedation and respiratory depression (slow, shallow breathing). Benzodiazepines taken with opioids add to each other in the same way, and UK drug safety advice warns that this increases the risk of coma and death.
  • Synergistic: the combined effect is greater than the sum. Co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim plus sulfamethoxazole) blocks two consecutive steps in folate synthesis and is more bactericidal (better at killing bacteria) than either component alone.
  • Antagonistic: one drug reduces the effect of the other. Naloxone reverses opioid sedation; vitamin K reverses the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.

The classic teaching example of a dangerous pharmacodynamic interaction is sildenafil and nitrates. Both increase intracellular cGMP: nitrates by donating nitric oxide, sildenafil by inhibiting phosphodiesterase-5, the enzyme that breaks cGMP down. Given together, profound vasodilation can produce a fatal drop in blood pressure. The sildenafil product information (the summary of product characteristics) lists nitrates as a contraindication. The British National Formulary (BNF) rates the interaction as severe and advises avoiding the combination.

Adverse Drug Reactions

An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is an unwanted or harmful reaction occurring after the administration of a drug, suspected or known to be due to that drug. A study published in 2004 found that 6.5% of 18,820 admissions at two Merseyside hospitals were related to ADRs. In 80% of those ADR-related admissions, the ADR was the direct cause of admission. This historical two-hospital finding is not a current estimate for all UK admissions.

The standard classification divides ADRs into types remembered as A B C D E, with a sixth, F, for failure of therapy. Rawlins and Thompson first described types A and B in 1977, and later authors extended the scheme. The first five types are:

  • A: Augmented. Predictable, dose-dependent extension of the drug's known pharmacological action. Hypoglycaemia (low blood glucose) from insulin; bradycardia (slow heart rate) from a beta-blocker; bleeding from warfarin. Type A reactions are common, and reviews describe them as more frequent than Type B reactions. The reported share of all ADRs varies widely between studies.
  • B: Bizarre. Unpredictable, not dose-dependent, often immune-mediated. Anaphylaxis to penicillin; Stevens-Johnson syndrome (a severe blistering skin reaction) from carbamazepine.
  • C: Chronic. Reactions that emerge with prolonged use. Cushing's syndrome from long-term prednisolone; osteoporosis from corticosteroids; tardive dyskinesia (involuntary movements, often of the face) from antipsychotics (medicines for psychosis).
  • D: Delayed. Effects that appear long after exposure. Secondary malignancies (new cancers) after alkylating (DNA-damaging) chemotherapy; teratogenesis (harm to the developing fetus) from antenatal exposure.
  • E: End-of-treatment. Reactions on stopping the drug, often a withdrawal syndrome. Rebound hypertension or unstable angina from sudden beta-blocker cessation; benzodiazepine withdrawal seizures.

Risk factors for ADRs are worth knowing: polypharmacy (taking many medicines at once), extremes of age, renal or hepatic impairment, narrow therapeutic index drugs, and female sex.

Suspected ADRs in the UK are reported to the Yellow Card Scheme, run by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Healthcare professionals are asked to report all suspected reactions to medicines marked with a black triangle (newer medicines under extra monitoring), and serious or medically significant reactions to established medicines. Patients and carers can report too. Reporting is covered in detail in the article on Pharmacovigilance (monitoring the safety of medicines).

A useful illustration of a Type A reaction is beta-blockers in asthma. Beta-blockers act as antagonists at β1 receptors in the heart, reducing rate and contractility. Non-selective agents also block β2 receptors in bronchial smooth muscle, where they are normally kept continuously stimulated at a low level by circulating adrenaline. Removing that background stimulation causes bronchoconstriction (narrowing of the airways), and in an asthmatic patient this can be severe. Cardioselective beta-blockers are safer, but even they should usually be avoided in patients with a history of asthma. They are used only with caution, under specialist supervision, when there is no alternative.

Tolerance, Tachyphylaxis and Receptor Regulation

The response to a drug often diminishes with repeated administration. This is called tolerance and matters clinically because it forces dose increases or treatment-free intervals.

Tolerance arises through several mechanisms:

  • Receptor downregulation: chronic stimulation reduces the number of receptors expressed at the cell surface (e.g. β-receptor downregulation in heart failure).
  • Receptor desensitisation: the receptor remains present but becomes uncoupled from its second messenger (an intracellular signalling molecule such as cAMP). An example is desensitisation of the β2-adrenergic receptor in patients on continuous high-dose salbutamol.
  • Depletion of mediator: the drug works through release of an endogenous substance which is then exhausted (e.g. tachyphylaxis, or rapid tolerance, to ephedrine. Ephedrine is an indirectly acting sympathomimetic: it works by releasing the body's own noradrenaline from nerve endings, and it depletes the neuronal stores).
  • Biochemical adaptation: tolerance to nitrates with continuous dosing is thought to involve sulfhydryl-group (a sulphur-containing chemical group) depletion, oxidative stress (damage from reactive oxygen molecules) and pseudo-tolerance (an apparent loss of effect) from neurohumoral activation (reflex hormone and nervous system responses); nitrate-free intervals are used to prevent it.
  • Increased metabolism: the drug induces its own metabolism via CYP induction (e.g. carbamazepine).
  • Physiological adaptation: the body counter-regulates the drug's effect (e.g. compensatory salt and water retention with vasodilators).

Tachyphylaxis is rapid tolerance: the response falls within minutes to hours of repeated dosing. It is a feature of indirectly acting sympathomimetics such as ephedrine, where repeated doses deplete the noradrenaline they release.

The opposite phenomenon is upregulation: chronic blockade of a receptor increases its expression. Sudden withdrawal of the blocker then exposes the patient to a hypersensitive system. This explains the rebound tachycardia and hypertension that can follow abrupt cessation of beta-blockers, and the rebound psychosis that can follow abrupt antipsychotic withdrawal.

Summary

Pharmacodynamics is the science of the drug-target interaction and the response that follows.

  • Drugs act on receptors, enzymes, ion channels and transporters.
  • Drug binding is described by affinity (how tightly it binds, Kd) and efficacy (the response it produces).
  • Agonists activate receptors (full or partial). Inverse agonists reduce baseline receptor activity. Antagonists block receptors (competitive or non-competitive).
  • The dose-response curve gives EC50 (potency) and Emax (efficacy).
  • Variability between patients comes from genetics, age, weight, disease and interactions.
  • Adverse drug reactions are classified A-E (Augmented, Bizarre, Chronic, Delayed, End-of-treatment).
  • Repeated dosing produces tolerance through receptor downregulation, desensitisation, induced metabolism or physiological adaptation.

Together with pharmacokinetics, these principles explain much of what follows in a pharmacology course. Every drug class in the rest of this series is best understood as a particular combination of target, binding behaviour and dose-response.

Reviewed by: Dr. Marcus Judge

Quiz

Preview the Pharmacodynamics quiz